Was That Mandu Really So Tasteless? Recollections of 2000s Cooking Flash Games
30
GG Vol.
26. 6. 10.

"Ptooey, ptooey! The mandu you made tastes terrible."
The Gohyang Mandu man spat out the dumpling along with his withering verdict. Mandu folded so carefully by a child's little hands gets rejected, over and over. Does the filling take sesame oil? Can you pan-fry a coiled one? This is the player, mouse in hand, turning the problem this way and that. Most children who played flash games in the 2000s will remember this one.
It has been well over twenty years since the flash game Gohyang Mandu came out. And yet people still talk about it. Even now, when someone posts a "Gohyang Mandu challenge" run on YouTube, others gather to watch, nod along, and dredge up their own childhood. Some say they only managed as adults to clear what they never could back then. Countless games drifted through our childhoods—so why does the Gohyang Mandu game, of all of them, stay etched so vividly in memory?
Child, Win Over the Fussy Proprietor
The "ajeossi" of Gohyang Mandu, "Shu" of the ramyeon shop, "Jumma" of the meat-grilling game, "Chef Tinghowa" of the jjajangmyeon game. Among flash games, plenty took cooking as their subject, and they shared a common figure: a character who kept watch over the cyber-kitchen and passed judgment on the food. (Ajeossi and jumma/ajumma are familiar Korean terms for a middle-aged man and woman—the gruff, everyday grown-ups of the neighborhood.) But the child playing was no expert cook. Still learning the world, they had neither the knowledge to choose ingredients nor a sure hand on the mouse.
Inevitably, the cooking heads for failure. And you can read that failure at a glance from the character's plight. Shu, decked out in pink, is sentenced to dishwashing when the player scorches the ramyeon pot. Jumma, who misses the moment to flip the meat, gets an ending where she goes hungry before a slab of blackened beef. The Gohyang Mandu man recites, point by point, exactly why the mandu is bad. Chef Tinghowa—the most theatrical of the lot—hurls the bowl and shouts that it tastes awful. Watching all this, a child laughs at how ridiculous the character is even as the urge to try again takes hold.
So the 2000s cooking flash games share a curious family resemblance: the goal of earning a passing grade from a virtual grown-up, and the child players sweating it out with clumsy skills. Try hard enough and you might reach a praise ending, but more often you were treated harshly, served up alongside your bad cooking. Even so, by the nature of flash games, retrying was easy—you could replay as many times as you liked.

In 〈Chef Tinghowa: Jjajangmyeon〉, the child earns praise by making a tasty bowl of jjajangmyeon. Wasn't Chef Tinghowa, after all, the child's partner in a game of make-believe house?
"Playing House" Moves onto the Digital Screen
Children play by imitating grown-ups, and we call it playing house (sokkomnori). Among its forms, the most everyday is the mimicry of keeping a home—gripping stones and sand and laying them out as rice and side dishes. Playing house is one face of how a child learns the world. And if the child even asks how the stone-food tastes, that is surely imitation of the nearest adults, the parents they have been watching.
In the sense of a game about making food, the cooking flash game is a digital version of playing house. A child frustrated by bad cooking retries; but a child's house-play curiosity—"what would the character do if I left out one ingredient?"—also keeps the game replaying. What digitization changed is that, in place of stones and sand, an image of food on the screen takes on a convincing shape. You cannot touch it, but cooking comes together by sight and sound with each click, and so the play pulls you in more deeply.
Virtual characters like Shu or the Gohyang Mandu man fill the empty seat of the make-believe playmate. A child alone with a mouse might have been bored, but the characters minding the kitchen, playing along, add the pleasure of role-play. And they did more than hold down a spot in the skit—they responded to the player's every success and failure, taking on the emotional give-and-take of real interaction. In this way cooking-house became the cooking flash game, and acquired the structure of role-play in sharper, more vivid images.
Come to think of it, the flash game was where a child performed their very first stint of kitchen work. With hands that had never once held a knife, they folded mandu, boiled ramyeon, and sold it—and the experience happened on screen before it ever happened for real. In early childhood the brain is still rapidly growing, and a first-time memory gets carved deep, easily summoned even in adulthood. It is the same logic by which a jingle heard as a child is still hummed years later. That is part of why the memory of the cooking flash game stays imprinted so long.

In 〈Jumma's Meat Grilling〉, the grilling is staged appetizingly through images and sound, yet there is no heat off the grill, no danger of spattering oil. A safe cooking experience, in other words.
Kitchen Work, Sliced Frame by Frame
In a flash game, cooking is designed as a game through the challenge of, and the grading of, what order to proceed in, when to move, and which ingredients to pick.
In Shu's Ramyeon Shop, the scallions and egg must go in only after the bubbles show that the ramyeon water has come to a boil; in Chef Tinghowa, you have to fry the chunjang first, then mix in the pork. You cannot change the order at will. Timing matters too. Because the ramyeon water boils after about four seconds, a fixed sequence of tasks must be completed on schedule; in Jumma's Meat Grilling, each side of the meat has its set cooking time, and Chef Tinghowa likewise demands that the wok work be timed to a "well-cooked" mark. Nor can just any ingredient go in. In Gohyang Mandu, the puzzle of picking only seven of fourteen options for the filling looks far from easy, even to a seasoned cook.
The visual change—mandu taking shape, ramyeon settling into the bowl, meat browning—is the immediate feedback a child's eye responds to best, and it can be run again, freely, any number of times. Burn something in real cooking and the ingredients are gone; ruin it in a game and you lose nothing. To wipe away the sting of failure at once and start over was a generous arrangement for a young player.
Mercifully, none of the kitchen dangers a child might face exist in the game. No cutting your hand on a knife, no burns from working the wok. In the end, weren't the cooking flash games well-made play-house kits you could reuse over and over? Food is a thing made of procedure to begin with, which makes it easy to port into a game. And so someone noticed exactly this—and turned the gamifying of cooking into a form of advertising.

〈Shu's Ramyeon Shop〉 is a high-difficulty game, hard even in adult hands. Which is exactly why time spent on the website Haitai Confectionery ran stretched longer.
Who Set Up This Kitchen? When Game and Advertisement Merge
An advergame is a portmanteau of advertisement and game. Roughly from the late 1990s into the 2000s, food companies' websites began offering children "playable ads"—content you could fairly call games—tied to their products. In the United States, food companies including Kellogg's, McDonald's, and Coca-Cola produced and ran advergames of their own.
The Gohyang Mandu and Shu games that Koreans now in their thirties remember are advergames. Gohyang Mandu is a Haitai Confectionery dumpling product, and the game was one of those distributed through iBravo, a flash-game website that Haitai operated. The Shu games lived on iBravo too. Flash games had become a kind of digital playing house for children, and iBravo—an advertising agenda laid quietly underneath—turned into the playground. Children sat in that playground folding mandu and boiling ramyeon.
That said, Gohyang Mandu and Shu took different advertising approaches. Gohyang Mandu is so simple as to be downright blunt: you have to land the correct recipe. What you folded in the game was the very dumpling Haitai sold, and hitting the right recipe amounted to memorizing the product. Tucked into the ingredient puzzle were Haitai's own snacks, like Ace and Ongseu-jjang.
The Shu game, by contrast, aimed not at an immediate product pitch but at dragging out the minutes, keeping you there. Neither the ramyeon Shu cooks, nor the dress-up clothes, nor the makeup you apply was anything Haitai sold. What the Shu game was after was time—getting children to drop by Haitai's website one more time, and to grow fond of the pink character.
The Playground May Vanish, but the Play Does Not
The cooking flash games were games for everyone. No download, no sign-up, no parental permission required. One click and the kitchen opened—in the school computer lab, at a friend's house, during recess. They needed no heavy hardware, and a single round did not run long. Those were their hallmarks.
Look closely and Gohyang Mandu and Shu were ads selling products, while Jumma's Meat Grilling and Chef Tinghowa were built to raise visitor numbers. One made games to sell snacks, another to hold visitors on a site—the aims differed a little, but the results looked alike. Playing house was processed into a digital game, and children, in front of the screen, began playing house all over again. And so the genre of the cooking flash game was made.
Flash, the platform underneath it all, ended service around 2020. Yet that fact seems hardly to matter to us. Just as we still gather at the park to play the childhood "cops and robbers" long after the schoolyard is gone, we are people long accustomed to replaying vanished games on new platforms.
So—was that mandu really so tasteless? There is no telling. The digital screen, in the end, cannot deliver taste. Whether the mandu we folded was any good, whether the ajeossi's scorn was fair, there is no way to confirm. And still, someone today will open that old kitchen again. The little hands have grown now, but the Gohyang Mandu man on the screen will still spit out the dumpling if even a single ingredient is wrong. Ptooey, ptooey—the mandu you made tastes terrible.

